‘Deliberate distortion of the reality lived by Muslim women’ by Haroon Siddiqui

By:  Columnist, The Star. 

The two most cited reasons in support of Quebec’s anti-niqab bill are that the veil is an imposed oppression since no woman would ever voluntarily wear it and, second, that the province’s proposal to deny public services to niqabi women is far less punitive than the strictures imposed on non-Muslims in some Muslim countries.

The first proposition is conjecture. The second is misguided moral equivalency.

We can’t, and don’t, run Canada by the rules of theocracies. Ours is a secular democracy, in which all citizens are equal and must be treated as such – not as a favour to them but as a duty to our Constitution.

This is so obvious a point as to be moot. But it is not with those who argue, quite seriously, that since Iran discriminates against Baha’is and Jews, and Saudi Arabia does not allow non-Muslims to even hold public religious services, Canadian Muslims shouldn’t complain if their rights are trampled.

Controversies are the lifeblood of democracy but they also provide insights into public prejudices.

It is commonly assumed that Muslim women the world over are oppressed, so they must be in Canada as well. Even intelligent people, including some academics, routinely parrot that line, with zero proof.

Muslim women are oppressed all right. But are they any more so than others?

Take violence against women. Studies show that the phenomenon cuts across class, race, culture and religion. A World Health Organization survey found violence against women by spouses/partners to be “a common experience worldwide.” In Europe, “domestic violence is the major cause of death and disability for women aged 16 to 44, and accounts for more death and ill-health than cancer or traffic accidents,” according to Amnesty International. A quarter of American women are physically or sexually assaulted by a partner or a date, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Take women in leadership roles. The three most populous Muslim nations – Indonesia, Pakistan and Bangladesh – have had women leaders. So has Turkey. Pakistan’s Benazir Bhutto and Bangladesh’s Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia served two terms each. Compare that to Kim Campbell, who was prime minister for 4 1/2 months.

In Pakistan’s National Assembly, 76 of 342 members are women – 22.2 per cent, compared with Canada’s 22.1 per cent in the Commons. Counting all elected women at the federal, provincial and municipal level, Pakistan ranks well ahead of Canada, according to the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

Take post-secondary education. Several Muslim nations, including Iran and Saudi Arabia, are showing the same trend as in the West, where a majority of students are women.

Contrast all this to the relentlessly negative portrayal of Muslim women in our popular culture. And when this image is grafted onto Muslim women in the West, the picture gets further distorted.

A Gallup survey shows that Muslim American women are among the most highly educated female religious groups, second only to Jewish American women. They are more likely than American Muslim men to have college and postgraduate degrees and to earn as much. “As a group, Muslim Americans have the highest degree of economic gender parity at the high and low ends of the spectrum.”

I can’t find comparable figures for Canada but there is little reason to think it is much different.

A separate Gallup poll shows majorities of Muslim women around the world believe that women should have the same legal rights as men. They may not equate the bikini with liberation but their aspirations are not much different than those of women elsewhere. This is even more so for Muslim women living in the West.

Also, the general values of Muslims living in Europe and North America, both men and women, are the same as those of other citizens.

None of this is to deny the many horrors inflicted daily on Muslim women or that some Canadian women may be forced to wear a veil. It is only to say that the opposite assumption – that all or nearly all are oppressed – is stupid and dishonest.

As Pankaj Mishra, noted Indian essayist and novelist and a Hindu familiar with the plight of women of all faiths, writes:

“Almost every day, the media berate Islam, often couching their prejudice in the highly moral language of women’s rights: It is not due to oversight that Indian women murdered for failing to bring sufficient dowry, a staggering 6,787 in 2005 (and since reported at 8,093 in 2007), occupy a fraction of the print acreage devoted to the tiny minority of veiled women.”

Haroon Siddiqui is the Star’s editorial page editor emeritus. His column appears Thursday and Sunday.


Originally Published at The Star.Com on Thu Apr 08 2010.

Canada: Victim’s family sues suspect in honor killing

By Scott Smith
Record Staff Writer
January 24, 2009 6:00 AM

STOCKTON – A man who awaits a murder trial on charges he gunned down his daughter’s former lover now faces a wrongful death lawsuit in civil court seeking $15 million on grounds he caused the man’s family emotional suffering.

Gurparkash Khalsa, 56, remains in jail charged with killing Ajmer Hothi, 23, on March 27, 2007.

Hothi’s mother found him shot to death in his big rig parked at a lot east of Stockton. Prosecutors say Khalsa committed the crime to restore his daughter’s honor.

Hothi’s Lodi family seeks the money to compensate for their loss and to send a message, their attorney Steven Brown said Friday.

“They want to make it clear that he needs to be held accountable,” Brown said. “They’re extremely distraught and upset.”

Brown filed the lawsuit Thursday in San Joaquin County Superior Court on behalf of Jasvir Kaur, Hothi’s widow; Avtar Hothi, his father; and Manjit Kaur Hothi, the dead man’s mother.

According to prosecutors, Khalsa stalked Hothi, who had dated Khalsa’s daughter and sought to marry her. The families of both men were members of the close-knit Stockton Sikh community.

Khalsa rejected Hothi’s bid to marry his daughter because Hothi was a trucker of a lower class, and Khalsa owned Pacific Coast Intermodal, a trucking firm based in French Camp, prosecutors have said.

Khalsa later learned that his daughter had aborted Hothi’s child.

The father then demanded the couple marry. But in the meantime Hothi’s parents had sent their son to India for an arranged marriage, according to court papers.

Prosecutors accuse Khalsa of tracking down Hothi and ambushing him in the cab of his big rig.

Hothi was shot nine times with a Beretta handgun similar to one Khalsa had registered years before, according to a police report. The gun was never recovered.

Khalsa’s attorney, Joel Carash, declined to comment for this story, citing the pending trial.

San Joaquin County Deputy District Attorney Robert Himelblau seeks a life prison term for Khalsa.

Khalsa and his attorneys are due in court next month to ask a judge to dismiss the criminal charges ahead of the jury trial set for May.

Contact reporter Scott Smith at (209) 546-8296 or ssmith @recordnet.com.


Iran: Controversial film a hit at Toronto festival

Posted at 18:28 on Fri, 09/19/2008
Region: Middle East
Country: Canada, Iran

Rome, 16 Sept. (AKI) – An Iranian feature film that tells the story of a woman being stoned to death has made headlines at the Toronto Film Festival and provoked an angry response from Iranian authorities.

The film, entitled ‘The Stoning of Soraya M.’ by Iranian-American director Sirous Norasteh, was shown at the festival which ended last Saturday.

The film tells the real-life story of Soraya, an 18-year-old woman and mother stoned to death in 1984 for alleged sexual infidelity in western Iran.

The film has been described by Iran’s state news agency Irna as another “Hollywood operation to damage the image of the Islamic Republic.”

“(It’s) a film that serves the warmongering strategy of George W. Bush,” said Iran’s semi-official news agency Fars.

The story of the film says that Soraya’s husband Ali no longer wants to be with her after they had four children together, and that he wants to marry a 14-year-old girl. Ali cannot afford two wives, so he demands a divorce from Soraya, who refuses for economic reasons. Instead, Ali conspires with the local mullah to frame Soraya for infidelity.

The story is told by her aunt, Zahra, played by Iranian expatriate and Oscar-nominated actress Shohre Aghadashlou.

The film is based on a book published in Paris in 1994 by Franco-Iranian journalist Fereydoun Sahebjam.

Fereydoun is played in the film by Jim Caveziel, who acted in Mel Gibson’s film The Passion of the Christ.

Original article: www.adnkronos.com
Via: muslimahmediawatch.org